ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Valuation Studies Method×Digital Methods×
领域Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20132013
提出者Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Fabian Muniesa, Michèle LamontRichard Rogers, Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative
类型Practice-oriented method for studying valuationEmpirical research approach for online data
开创性文献Helgesson, C.-F., & Muniesa, F. (2013). For what it's worth: an introduction to valuation studies. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 1-10. DOI ↗Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262018838
别名Sociology of valuation, Valography, Study of evaluation practicesFollow the medium, Natively digital research, Web epistemology methods
相关44
摘要The valuation studies method treats valuation—the production, measurement, ordering, and contestation of worth—as a social practice to be studied empirically rather than a hidden mental act or a settled economic fact. Consolidated by Claes-Fredrik Helgesson and Fabian Muniesa and complemented by Michèle Lamont's comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation, it follows how rankings, metrics, prices, and evaluation procedures actually do their work, and asks how worth comes to be, by whom, with which devices, and to what effect.Digital methods is an empirical research approach, developed by Richard Rogers and the Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative, that takes the methods of online platforms and devices—the link, the like, the hashtag, the search engine ranking—and repurposes them for social and cultural research. Its guiding maxim is to 'follow the medium': rather than importing offline methods like the survey onto the web, the analyst learns what the medium already counts, ranks, and recommends, and turns those native operations into research instruments.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Valuation Studies Method · Digital Methods. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare