方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Valuation Studies Method× | Actor-Network Theory Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2013 | 1984 |
| 提出者≠ | Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Fabian Muniesa, Michèle Lamont | Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law |
| 类型≠ | Practice-oriented method for studying valuation | Material-semiotic theory and analytic method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Helgesson, C.-F., & Muniesa, F. (2013). For what it's worth: an introduction to valuation studies. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 1-10. DOI ↗ | Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051 |
| 别名 | Sociology of valuation, Valography, Study of evaluation practices | ANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The valuation studies method treats valuation—the production, measurement, ordering, and contestation of worth—as a social practice to be studied empirically rather than a hidden mental act or a settled economic fact. Consolidated by Claes-Fredrik Helgesson and Fabian Muniesa and complemented by Michèle Lamont's comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation, it follows how rankings, metrics, prices, and evaluation procedures actually do their work, and asks how worth comes to be, by whom, with which devices, and to what effect. | Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|