ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Uses and Gratifications Survey×Media Richness Analysis×
领域CommunicationCommunication
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19731986
提出者Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler & Michael GurevitchRichard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel
类型Audience-centered survey approach to media motivations and rewardsFramework and method for assessing channel richness vs. task equivocality
开创性文献Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. DOI ↗Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. DOI ↗
别名U&G survey, Gratifications sought and obtained survey, Media gratifications measurement, Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar AnketiMedia richness theory analysis, Information richness analysis, Channel richness assessment, Ortam Zenginliği Analizi
相关43
摘要The uses and gratifications survey is the dominant audience-centered method in communication research, asking not what media do to people but what people do with media. Codified by Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch in 1973, it treats audiences as active agents who select media to satisfy social and psychological needs, and it measures those motives and the rewards obtained through structured self-report scales.Media richness analysis applies Daft and Lengel's media richness theory to evaluate communication channels by their capacity to carry rich information and to assess how well a channel fits the equivocality of the task at hand. Rooted in organizational communication, it provides criteria — feedback immediacy, multiplicity of cues, language variety, and personal focus — for ranking channels from lean (a memo) to rich (face-to-face) and for diagnosing whether managers and teams are matching channel to message appropriately.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Uses and Gratifications Survey · Media Richness Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare