ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

使用磨损分析×几何形态学×
领域考古学考古学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19801991
提出者Lawrence KeeleyFred Bookstein
类型Tool function inferenceShape and form analysis
开创性文献Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗
别名microwear, tool use analysisshape analysis, morphometric analysis
相关44
摘要Use-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies.Geometric morphometrics is a quantitative analytical method that captures, analyzes, and compares the shapes of biological structures (bones, teeth, pottery) using coordinate data from landmarks and outlines. Developed by Fred Bookstein in the 1990s, GMM provides a rigorous statistical framework for studying shape variation across populations or time periods. The method allows archaeologists to quantify morphological differences between individuals, populations, or artifact classes with precision impossible using traditional linear measurements.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Use-Wear Analysis · Geometric Morphometrics. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare