ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

使用磨损分析×陶瓷岩相学×
领域考古学考古学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19801976
提出者Lawrence KeeleyPeter Stimmung
类型Tool function inferenceClay and temper sourcing
开创性文献Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗Quinn, P. S. (2013). Ceramic Petrology: The Interpretation of Ceramic Artifacts in Archaeological Science. Archaeopress. link ↗
别名microwear, tool use analysisceramic thin section analysis, pottery petrography
相关44
摘要Use-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies.Ceramic petrography analyzes pottery through microscopic examination of thin sections cut from pottery sherds. This method determines clay sources, identifies non-plastic inclusions (temper), and reconstructs pottery production technology. Pioneered by Peter Stimmung and others, ceramic petrography reveals whether pottery was made locally or imported, and whether specific production groups or workshops created vessels with distinctive raw material recipes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Use-Wear Analysis · Ceramic Petrography. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare