ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

二参数逻辑IRT模型 (2PL)×评分者间信度(Cohen's κ 和 ICC)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19801960 (kappa); 1979 (ICC)
提出者Frederic M. LordCohen (kappa, 1960); Shrout & Fleiss (ICC, 1979)
类型Item response model / latent trait modelReliability / agreement analysis
开创性文献Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Erlbaum. link ↗Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. DOI ↗
别名two-parameter logistic model, 2PL model, 2PL IRT — İki Parametreli Madde Tepki Modeliinter-rater reliability, interrater agreement, rater agreement, Değerlendiriciler Arası Güvenilirlik (Cohen's κ, ICC)
相关66
摘要The two-parameter logistic item response model, formalised by Frederic Lord (1980), describes the probability that a respondent answers a binary test item correctly as a smooth S-shaped function of the respondent's latent ability. By estimating a separate discrimination parameter for each item alongside a difficulty parameter, 2PL allows items to differ in how sharply they distinguish high- from low-ability respondents — making it the standard model for large-scale educational and psychological assessments.Interrater reliability quantifies the degree to which two or more independent raters produce consistent scores when evaluating the same individuals or products. The family encompasses Cohen's kappa, introduced in 1960 for categorical judgments, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for continuous ratings, together spanning most measurement scenarios encountered in behavioral, health, and educational research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: 2PL IRT · Interrater Reliability. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare