方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 三角检验证据× | 混合方法研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 调查方法论 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1970s–1980s | — |
| 提出者≠ | Norman K. Denzin (triangulation); Yvonna Lincoln & Egon Guba (trustworthiness framework) | — |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative data collection and verification technique | Research design framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ | Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 别名≠ | multi-source field notes, cross-observer field notes, triangulated observation notes, TFN | Karma Yöntem Araştırması (Mixed Methods), multi-method research, triangulation design |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Triangulated Field Notes is a qualitative data collection technique in which field notes are recorded independently by multiple observers, from multiple vantage points, or at multiple time points and then systematically compared to strengthen the credibility and completeness of observational data. Rooted in Denzin's triangulation framework and Lincoln and Guba's trustworthiness criteria, the approach counters observer bias by cross-checking accounts before analysis begins. | Mixed methods research is a systematic research design in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected and analysed within a single study. Formalised by Creswell and Plano Clark (2003, 3rd ed. 2018), it offers three principal design variants — concurrent, sequential, and transformative — and strengthens findings through triangulation across both data strands. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|