方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 转型混合方法设计× | 并行三角混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003–2009 | 2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.) |
| 提出者≠ | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 类型 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| 别名 | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods | convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. | The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|