ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

时间切片主题演化分析×系统性文献综述×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2011–20121993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
提出者Cobo, López-Herrera, Herrera-Viedma & HerreraArchie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
类型Longitudinal bibliometric analysisEvidence synthesis methodology
开创性文献Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. DOI ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
别名longitudinal thematic mapping, temporal thematic evolution, time-period thematic analysis, diachronic science mappingSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
相关65
摘要Time-sliced thematic evolution analysis is a bibliometric method that divides a corpus of publications into consecutive time windows and tracks how research themes emerge, consolidate, split, merge, or disappear across those periods. By applying co-word analysis and strategic-diagram mapping within each slice and then linking themes across slices, it reveals the intellectual trajectory of a research field over time.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Time-sliced Thematic Evolution Analysis · Systematic Literature Review. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare