ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

时间切片主题演化分析×共词分析×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2011–20121983
提出者Cobo, López-Herrera, Herrera-Viedma & HerreraMichel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleagues
类型Longitudinal bibliometric analysisScientometric network analysis technique
开创性文献Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. DOI ↗Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗
别名longitudinal thematic mapping, temporal thematic evolution, time-period thematic analysis, diachronic science mappingkeyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWA
相关66
摘要Time-sliced thematic evolution analysis is a bibliometric method that divides a corpus of publications into consecutive time windows and tracks how research themes emerge, consolidate, split, merge, or disappear across those periods. By applying co-word analysis and strategic-diagram mapping within each slice and then linking themes across slices, it reveals the intellectual trajectory of a research field over time.Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Time-sliced Thematic Evolution Analysis · Co-word Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare