ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

时间切片主题演化分析×文献计量分析×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2011–20121969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
提出者Cobo, López-Herrera, Herrera-Viedma & HerreraAlan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
类型Longitudinal bibliometric analysisQuantitative literature analysis
开创性文献Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
别名longitudinal thematic mapping, temporal thematic evolution, time-period thematic analysis, diachronic science mappingbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
相关66
摘要Time-sliced thematic evolution analysis is a bibliometric method that divides a corpus of publications into consecutive time windows and tracks how research themes emerge, consolidate, split, merge, or disappear across those periods. By applying co-word analysis and strategic-diagram mapping within each slice and then linking themes across slices, it reveals the intellectual trajectory of a research field over time.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Time-sliced Thematic Evolution Analysis · Bibliometric Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare