方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 时间切片式科学计量分析× | 共词分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 科学计量学 | 科学计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s | 1983 |
| 提出者≠ | Derived from scientometrics tradition; temporal slicing formalized in longitudinal bibliometric studies from the 1980s onward | Michel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleagues |
| 类型≠ | Quantitative longitudinal analysis | Scientometric network analysis technique |
| 开创性文献≠ | Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. link ↗ | Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | temporal scientometrics, period-based scientometric analysis, time-window scientometrics, longitudinal scientometric analysis | keyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWA |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Time-sliced scientometric analysis divides a bibliographic corpus into discrete temporal windows — commonly five- or ten-year periods — and applies standard scientometric indicators (publication counts, citation rates, h-index, collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence) within each slice. By comparing results across slices, researchers can reconstruct how a scientific field has grown, shifted focus, formed new collaborations, or declined in influence over time. The approach combines the rigor of quantitative scientometrics with an explicit longitudinal dimension. | Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|