ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

时间切片式图谱综述×范围界定审查×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s2005
提出者Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & ThomasHilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
类型Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentationEvidence synthesis review design
开创性文献Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
别名temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping reviewscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
相关66
摘要A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Time-sliced Mapping review · Scoping Review. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare