方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 时间切片式图谱综述× | 文献计量分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 科学计量学 | 科学计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| 提出者≠ | Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| 类型≠ | Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation | Quantitative literature analysis |
| 开创性文献≠ | Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842 | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| 别名 | temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|