方法对比

	时间切片引文分析	科学计量分析
领域	科学计量学	科学计量学
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1955–1965 (foundational); temporal slicing formalized in scientometrics from the 1980s onward	1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work)
提出者	Eugene Garfield (citation analysis foundation); Derek J. de Solla Price (temporal/longitudinal framing)	V. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods)
类型	Quantitative scientometric technique	Quantitative literature analysis
开创性文献	Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.	Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka.
别名	temporal citation analysis, longitudinal citation analysis, time-window citation analysis, diachronic citation analysis	scientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysis
相关	6	6
摘要	Time-sliced citation analysis partitions a body of literature into sequential temporal windows — for example, five-year intervals — and performs citation analysis within and across each window. This reveals how citation patterns, influential papers, and knowledge flows shift over time, providing a dynamic picture of a field's intellectual evolution rather than a static aggregate snapshot.	Scientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads.