ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

测验等值×概化理论(G-Theory)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1984 (modern statistical treatment)1963–1972
提出者Kolen & Brennan (foundational treatise, 2004/2014); Holland & Dorans (2006)Lee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam
类型Score transformation / latent-scale calibrationVariance-components reliability model
开创性文献Kolen, M.J. & Brennan, R.L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4939-0316-6Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley. link ↗
别名Test Eşitleme (Test Equating), score equating, equipercentile equating, IRT true-score equatingG-theory, G-study / D-study framework, variance components reliability
相关44
摘要Test equating is a family of statistical methods that converts scores earned on one test form onto the score scale of another form, so that scores from different administrations or versions can be compared and reported on a common metric. The foundational modern treatment is Kolen and Brennan (2004/2014); Holland and Dorans (2006) provide the authoritative chapter-length overview within the field of educational measurement.Generalizability Theory is a psychometric framework that decomposes observed score variance into multiple sources — persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — using analysis of variance. It replaces the single reliability coefficient of classical test theory with a family of coefficients that tell researchers how well scores generalize across different measurement conditions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Test Equating · Generalizability Theory. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare