ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

技术债务度量×软件复杂度度量×
领域软件工程软件工程
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19921976
提出者Ward CunninghamThomas J. McCabe
类型quantitative assessmentquantitative measurement
开创性文献Cunningham, W. (1992). The WyCash Portfolio Management System. OOPSLA 92 Experience Report. link ↗McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗
别名debt metrics, code health scoring, maintenance burden assessmentcode complexity analysis, complexity measurement
相关44
摘要Technical debt represents accumulated shortcuts, deferred maintenance, and design compromises that incur future costs through slower development, higher defect rates, and deployment difficulty. Introduced by Ward Cunningham (1992), technical debt measurement quantifies these burdens using metrics like code complexity, duplication, test coverage gaps, and maintainability indices. Organizations use debt measurement to balance immediate delivery with long-term sustainability.Software complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Technical Debt Measurement · Software Complexity Metrics. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare