ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

技术债务度量×代码覆盖率分析×
领域软件工程软件工程
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19921988
提出者Ward CunninghamTest Coverage Community
类型quantitative assessmentmeasurement and analysis
开创性文献Cunningham, W. (1992). The WyCash Portfolio Management System. OOPSLA 92 Experience Report. link ↗Zhu, H., Hall, P. A. V., & May, J. H. R. (1997). Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM Computing Surveys, 29(4), 366–427. DOI ↗
别名debt metrics, code health scoring, maintenance burden assessmentcoverage metrics, test coverage, instrumentation-based measurement
相关44
摘要Technical debt represents accumulated shortcuts, deferred maintenance, and design compromises that incur future costs through slower development, higher defect rates, and deployment difficulty. Introduced by Ward Cunningham (1992), technical debt measurement quantifies these burdens using metrics like code complexity, duplication, test coverage gaps, and maintainability indices. Organizations use debt measurement to balance immediate delivery with long-term sustainability.Code coverage analysis measures the extent to which source code is executed by a test suite, quantifying which lines, branches, or paths are exercised. Tools instrument code to track execution, reporting coverage percentages and identifying untested regions. Coverage analysis guides test creation, detects dead code, and validates test adequacy in quality assurance processes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Technical Debt Measurement · Code Coverage Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare