ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

污点分析×静态应用程序安全测试×符号执行×
领域密码学密码学密码学
方法族Machine learningMachine learningMachine learning
起源年份20052000s1976
提出者James NewsomeVarious researchersJames C. King
类型data flow tracking techniquesource code vulnerability detectionformal verification technique
开创性文献Newsome, J., & Song, D. X. (2005). Dynamic taint analysis for automatic detection, analysis, and signature generation of exploits on commodity software. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS 2005). link ↗Chess, B., & West, J. (2007). Secure Programming with Static Analysis. Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN: 978-0321424778King, J. C. (1976). Symbolic execution and program testing. Communications of the ACM, 19(7), 385-394. DOI ↗
别名taint analysis, information flow, data taintingSAST, white-box testing, source code analysissymbolic execution, symbolic analysis, concolic execution
相关333
摘要Taint analysis is a data flow analysis technique that tracks how untrusted (tainted) input flows through a program to identify vulnerabilities where tainted data reaches dangerous operations (sinks). Formalized by Newsome and Song in 2005, taint analysis marks input data as tainted and propagates taint labels through the program, alerting when tainted data reaches sensitive operations like SQL queries or system calls. Taint analysis is fundamental to detecting injection vulnerabilities and is widely used in dynamic analysis tools and security monitoring systems.Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a security analysis technique that examines source code or compiled binaries without executing the program to identify vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and security flaws. Developed in the 2000s, SAST analyzes code structure, data flow, and control flow to detect potential bugs such as SQL injection, buffer overflows, and insecure cryptographic usage. SAST is widely integrated into development workflows as a shift-left security practice, enabling early detection of vulnerabilities before code reaches production.Symbolic execution is a program analysis technique that executes programs using symbolic (non-concrete) values instead of actual inputs, tracking how symbolic values flow through the program. Introduced by James C. King in 1976, symbolic execution builds mathematical constraints on program variables and can determine which inputs cause specific program behaviors, enabling automatic test generation and vulnerability detection. Modern symbolic execution tools like KLEE, S2E, and Z3 have become powerful instruments for finding subtle bugs and security vulnerabilities.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Taint Analysis · Static Application Security Testing · Symbolic Execution. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare