方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| System Justification Scale× | 右翼威权主义量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 政治心理学 | 社会心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1994 | 1981 |
| 提出者≠ | John T. Jost & Mahzarin R. Banaji | Bob Altemeyer |
| 类型≠ | Self-report attitude scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| 开创性文献≠ | Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | SJS, General System Justification Scale, Economic System Justification Scale | RWA |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|