ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

步骤权重评估比率分析×AROMAN(考虑双步归一化的排序顺序方法)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20102022
提出者Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
类型Sequential step-ratio subjective weightingTwo-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
开创性文献Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management DOI ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: SWARA · AROMAN. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare