方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 可持续消费量表× | 碳足迹意识量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 环境心理学 | 环境心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2008 | 2011 |
| 提出者≠ | Anna M. Sundström, Iris Vermeir, Wim Verbeke | Alan Collins, Stefan Gössling, C. Michael Hall |
| 类型≠ | Self-report frequency and behavior scale | Self-report awareness and knowledge scale |
| 开创性文献≠ | Sundström, A. M. (2014). An investigation of the relationship between sustainable values and consumption patterns. In Interdisciplinary book of sustainable development. InTech Press. link ↗ | Collins, A., Gössling, S., & Hall, C. M. (2011). Assessing the environmental impacts of tourism: Development of a carbon footprint toolkit. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 497–516. link ↗ |
| 别名 | SCS, Sustainable Lifestyle Scale | CFAS, Carbon Awareness Inventory |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Sustainable Consumption Scale (SCS) measures the extent to which individuals adopt sustainable and ethical consumption practices across multiple life domains including food, clothing, household products, transportation, and waste. Developed within ecological economics and consumer behavior frameworks (Sundström, 2014; Vermeir & Verbeke, 2008), the SCS captures integrated sustainable lifestyle rather than isolated green behaviors. The scale is widely used in research on sustainable consumption patterns, consumer segmentation for green marketing, and evaluation of sustainability interventions targeting lifestyle transformation. | The Carbon Footprint Awareness Scale (CFAS) measures individuals' knowledge, consciousness, and sense of responsibility regarding their carbon emissions—how much people understand the carbon impacts of their consumption, energy use, and travel patterns. Developed by Collins, Gössling, and Hall (2011) for sustainability tourism research and extended to general populations, the CFAS captures awareness of carbon-intensive activities, estimation accuracy of personal emissions, and commitment to carbon reduction. The scale is critical for evaluating climate communication effectiveness, identifying knowledge gaps that block behavior change, and assessing whether carbon labeling, footprint calculators, and climate education successfully shift consciousness of personal climate impact. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|