ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Structural Equivalence×Homophily Analysis×
领域SociologySociology
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19711954 (concept); 2001 (synthesis)
提出者François Lorrain & Harrison WhiteLazarsfeld & Merton (concept); McPherson, Smith-Lovin & Cook (synthesis)
类型Equivalence relation grouping actors with identical tie patternsMeasurement of similarity-based tie formation
开创性文献Lorrain, F., & White, H. C. (1971). Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 49–80. DOI ↗McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. DOI ↗
别名structural equivalence analysis, positional equivalence, Euclidean equivalence of actors, equivalence classeshomophily measurement, assortative mixing analysis, birds-of-a-feather analysis, tie-similarity analysis
相关54
摘要Structural equivalence identifies actors who occupy the same position in a network because they have identical ties to identical others. Defined by François Lorrain and Harrison White in 1971, it formalizes the idea that two people are interchangeable in the social structure when they relate to exactly the same set of third parties, and it provides the foundation for partitioning networks into positions and building blockmodels.Homophily analysis quantifies the tendency of similar individuals to form ties — the principle that 'birds of a feather flock together'. It compares the rate at which people connect with others who share an attribute (race, gender, age, education, attitudes) against what would be expected by chance, distinguishing the homophily that arises merely from group sizes from the genuine, behavior-driven preference for similar others.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Structural Equivalence · Homophily Analysis. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare