ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

STROBE Checklist: 观察性研究报告标准×PRISMA清单:系统评价和荟萃分析报告标准×
领域研究方法论研究方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20072021 (original 2009)
提出者Von Elm et al. (STROBE Group)Page et al. (PRISMA Group)
类型Study author reporting checklistSystematic review author reporting checklist
开创性文献Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. DOI ↗Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗
别名STROBEPRISMA, PRISMA 2020
相关44
摘要STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) is a 22-item evidence-based checklist published in 2007 by Von Elm et al. to improve the quality of reporting of cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional observational studies. Like CONSORT for RCTs, STROBE is endorsed by over 300 journals and is widely considered the reporting standard for observational epidemiological research.PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: STROBE Checklist · PRISMA Checklist. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare