方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| STROBE Checklist: 观察性研究报告标准× | Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Observational Study Quality Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究方法论 | 研究方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2007 | 2000 |
| 提出者≠ | Von Elm et al. (STROBE Group) | Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute) |
| 类型≠ | Study author reporting checklist | Research team assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. DOI ↗ | Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. link ↗ |
| 别名 | STROBE | NOS |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) is a 22-item evidence-based checklist published in 2007 by Von Elm et al. to improve the quality of reporting of cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional observational studies. Like CONSORT for RCTs, STROBE is endorsed by over 300 journals and is widely considered the reporting standard for observational epidemiological research. | The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|