方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| STROBE Checklist: 观察性研究报告标准× | CASP 随机对照试验清单× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究方法论 | 研究方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2007 | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| 提出者≠ | Von Elm et al. (STROBE Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| 类型≠ | Study author reporting checklist | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | STROBE | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) is a 22-item evidence-based checklist published in 2007 by Von Elm et al. to improve the quality of reporting of cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional observational studies. Like CONSORT for RCTs, STROBE is endorsed by over 300 journals and is widely considered the reporting standard for observational epidemiological research. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|