ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Speech Act Analysis×批判性话语分析 (CDA)×
领域语言学质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1962Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提出者J. L. Austin and John R. Searle (analytic method derived from speech act theory)Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
类型Qualitative pragmatic coding of utterances for illocutionary forceQualitative research method
开创性文献Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198245537Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
别名Illocutionary Force Analysis, Speech Act Coding, Pragmatic Act AnalysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
相关46
摘要Speech act analysis is the empirical, qualitative method of examining real utterances for the actions they perform — promising, requesting, apologizing, warning, declaring — rather than merely for what they describe. Building on J. L. Austin's insight that saying is doing and on John Searle's systematic taxonomy of illocutionary acts, the analyst segments discourse into utterances, identifies the illocutionary force of each, classifies it (as a representative, directive, commissive, expressive, or declaration), and notes whether the act is performed directly or indirectly. It turns the philosophy of language into a coding procedure that can be applied to conversations, written texts, and elicited data.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Speech Act Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare