ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

空间因果敏感性分析×空间滞后模型(SAR / 空间自回归)×
领域因果推断空间分析
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1988–2021 (developed progressively)1988
提出者Anselin (1988) for spatial diagnostics; Reich et al. (2021) for spatial causal frameworksAnselin (textbook formalisation); LeSage & Pace
类型Sensitivity / robustness analysisSpatial autoregressive regression
开创性文献Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. ISBN: 978-9024737322Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic. DOI ↗
别名spatial causal sensitivity, spatial robustness checks, SSAC, spatial confounding sensitivitySAR model, spatial autoregressive model, spatial lag, Uzamsal Gecikme Modeli (SAR / Spatial Lag)
相关65
摘要Spatial sensitivity analysis for causality systematically tests whether a causal estimate derived from georeferenced data holds up as spatial structure, spillovers, and the choice of spatial weights matrix are varied. Because nearby units often share unmeasured confounders — soil quality, local infrastructure, neighbourhood norms — a naive regression may yield biased causal estimates. This method reveals how fragile or robust a claimed causal effect is to alternative spatial specifications.The Spatial Lag Model is an autoregressive regression that assumes spatial dependence in the dependent variable itself: the outcome values of neighbouring units enter the model as an explanatory term (ρWy). It was formalised in Anselin's Spatial Econometrics (1988) and developed further by LeSage and Pace (2009), and it decomposes spillover effects into direct, indirect, and total impacts.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Spatial Sensitivity Analysis for Causality · Spatial Lag Model. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare