ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

空间因果敏感性分析×地理加权回归 (GWR)×
领域因果推断空间分析
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1988–2021 (developed progressively)2002
提出者Anselin (1988) for spatial diagnostics; Reich et al. (2021) for spatial causal frameworksFotheringham, Brunsdon & Charlton
类型Sensitivity / robustness analysisLocal spatial regression
开创性文献Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. ISBN: 978-9024737322Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496168
别名spatial causal sensitivity, spatial robustness checks, SSAC, spatial confounding sensitivityGWR, local regression, spatially varying coefficient regression, Coğrafi Ağırlıklı Regresyon (GWR)
相关65
摘要Spatial sensitivity analysis for causality systematically tests whether a causal estimate derived from georeferenced data holds up as spatial structure, spillovers, and the choice of spatial weights matrix are varied. Because nearby units often share unmeasured confounders — soil quality, local infrastructure, neighbourhood norms — a naive regression may yield biased causal estimates. This method reveals how fragile or robust a claimed causal effect is to alternative spatial specifications.Geographically Weighted Regression is a local regression method, introduced by Fotheringham, Brunsdon and Charlton (2002), that allows the regression coefficients to vary across space. Instead of one global equation, it fits a separate set of coefficients at every location, capturing spatial heterogeneity in the relationships.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Spatial Sensitivity Analysis for Causality · Geographically Weighted Regression. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare