ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

空间倾向得分匹配×粗化精确匹配 (CEM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2000s2011-2012
提出者Extension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onwardIacus, King, & Porro
类型Quasi-experimental matching estimatorMatching / causal inference
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
别名Spatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matchingCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
相关66
摘要Spatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Spatial Propensity Score Matching · Coarsened Exact Matching. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare