方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Social Shaping of Technology× | Social Construction of Technology× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1985 | 1984 |
| 提出者≠ | Donald MacKenzie, Judy Wajcman, Robin Williams, David Edge | Trevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker |
| 类型≠ | Analytic tradition and method in the sociology of technology | Constructivist theory of technological development |
| 开创性文献≠ | MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press. ISBN: 9780335199136 | Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | SST analysis, Social shaping approach, Shaping of technology framework | SCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Social Shaping of Technology (SST) is the umbrella tradition in the sociology of technology that rejects technological determinism and argues that the content and trajectory of technical artefacts are themselves outcomes of social, economic, organisational, and political choices. Rather than treating technology as an autonomous force whose effects society must merely absorb, SST analysis opens the 'black box' of design and shows that at every stage—conception, development, standardisation, and use—things could have been, and were, decided otherwise. | The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|