方法对比

	Social Functioning Assessment	Rapid Assessment Instrument
领域	Social Work	Social Work
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1976	2002
提出者	Social-adjustment measurement tradition; self-report scale by Weissman & Bothwell	Walter W. Hudson and the clinical-measurement tradition; codified by Springer, Abell & Hudson
类型	Assessment of a person's performance across major social roles and life domains	Brief, standardized, self-report measure for repeated use in practice
开创性文献	Weissman, M. M., & Bothwell, S. (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(9), 1111–1115.	Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3), 408–439.
别名	Social Functioning Measurement, Role Functioning Assessment, Psychosocial Functioning Assessment, Social Adjustment Assessment	RAI, Rapid Assessment Instruments, Brief Standardized Self-Report Scale, Clinical Measurement Package Scales
相关	4	4
摘要	Social functioning assessment evaluates how well a person performs the major social roles of everyday life — work or school, family and parenting, intimate and social relationships, and economic and community participation — and how satisfied they are with that performance. Building on the social-adjustment measurement tradition and instruments such as Weissman and Bothwell's Social Adjustment Scale, it gives social workers a structured, quantifiable account of psychosocial functioning that goes beyond symptoms to capture the person-in-environment outcomes at the heart of social work.	A rapid assessment instrument (RAI) is a short, standardized, self-report measure designed to be completed quickly and repeatedly so that a social worker can assess the magnitude of a client's problem, compare it against a validated clinical cutoff, and monitor change over the course of an intervention. The format was championed by Walter Hudson, whose Clinical Measurement Package scales set the template, and was systematized for practitioners by Springer, Abell, and Hudson, who laid out how to create and validate such instruments for practice and research.