ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Social Disorganization Analysis×Collective Efficacy Scale×
领域CriminologyCriminology
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19421997
提出者Clifford R. Shaw & Henry D. McKayRobert J. Sampson, Stephen W. Raudenbush & Felton Earls
类型Ecological theory and analysis of neighborhood structural sources of crimeEcometric measurement scale of neighborhood social cohesion and informal social control
开创性文献Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. DOI ↗Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. DOI ↗
别名Social Disorganization Theory, Shaw and McKay Model, Neighborhood Social Disorganization Analysis, Community Structure and Crime AnalysisCollective Efficacy Measure, Neighborhood Collective Efficacy Scale, Sampson Collective Efficacy Scale, Social Cohesion and Informal Control Scale
相关43
摘要Social disorganization analysis explains why crime concentrates in some neighborhoods regardless of who lives there, tracing it to community structural conditions rather than individual pathology. Building on Shaw and McKay's classic Chicago studies, it argues that poverty, residential instability, and ethnic heterogeneity undermine a neighborhood's capacity for informal social control, which in turn raises crime and delinquency — a chain that Sampson and Groves later tested empirically with survey-based measures of community social ties.The collective efficacy scale measures a neighborhood's shared capacity to maintain order: the combination of social cohesion and mutual trust among residents with their shared willingness to intervene for the common good. Introduced by Sampson, Raudenbush, and Earls in their landmark 1997 Science study, it operationalizes a reformulation of social disorganization theory and is constructed with ecometric methods that aggregate individual survey responses into reliable neighborhood-level scores.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Social Disorganization Analysis · Collective Efficacy Scale. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare