ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Social Construction of Technology×Technological Frames Analysis×
领域Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19841995
提出者Trevor Pinch & Wiebe BijkerWiebe E. Bijker; extended to organisations by Wanda Orlikowski & Debra Gash
类型Constructivist theory of technological developmentQualitative interpretive method
开创性文献Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262023764
别名SCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysisTechnological frame analysis, Frame incongruence analysis, Relevant social group framing
相关44
摘要The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one.Technological frames analysis examines the shared assumptions, goals, and problem-solving strategies through which groups make sense of a technology and act upon it. Introduced by Wiebe Bijker as part of the social construction of technology, a technological frame structures the interaction among members of a relevant social group and binds the meaning of an artefact to their concerns. Wanda Orlikowski and Debra Gash later carried the concept into organisations, showing how different stakeholder groups hold distinct frames about information technology and how the resulting frame incongruence shapes adoption and use. The method reconstructs these frames, analyses their content, and links them to technological outcomes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Social Construction of Technology · Technological Frames Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare