方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 社会凝聚力量表× | 机构信任量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 政治社会学 | 政治社会学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1997–2006 | 1975–2011 |
| 提出者≠ | Robert Sampson, Ray Forrest, Akhtar Kearns | David Easton, Marc Hetherington, Pippa Norris |
| 类型 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924. DOI ↗ | Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | SCS, Social Integration Index | ITS, Institutional Confidence Index |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Social Cohesion Scale measures the degree to which members of a community feel integrated, connected, and unified by shared values and mutual support. Developed across multiple traditions—notably by Robert Sampson and colleagues in criminology and urban sociology, and by Forrest & Kearns in housing research—it assesses both the structural glue (institutions, networks) and affective bonds (belonging, solidarity) that hold communities together. | The Institutional Trust Scale measures an individual's confidence and trust in formal political and social institutions including parliament, courts, police, media, and civil service. Distinct from generalized interpersonal trust, institutional trust reflects belief in the legitimacy, fairness, and effectiveness of formal organizations that structure governance and public life. Developed in political science by scholars including David Easton and Marc Hetherington, it is a key indicator of democratic health and governance legitimacy. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|