方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 社会凝聚力量表× | 公民参与量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 政治社会学 | 政治社会学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1997–2006 | 1995–2008 |
| 提出者≠ | Robert Sampson, Ray Forrest, Akhtar Kearns | Cliff Zukin, Scott Keeter, Russell Dalton |
| 类型≠ | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire / Behavioral frequency |
| 开创性文献≠ | Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924. DOI ↗ | Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | SCS, Social Integration Index | CES, Political Participation Scale |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Social Cohesion Scale measures the degree to which members of a community feel integrated, connected, and unified by shared values and mutual support. Developed across multiple traditions—notably by Robert Sampson and colleagues in criminology and urban sociology, and by Forrest & Kearns in housing research—it assesses both the structural glue (institutions, networks) and affective bonds (belonging, solidarity) that hold communities together. | The Civic Engagement Scale measures the extent and type of an individual's participation in civic, political, and community life. Rather than a single construct, it typically encompasses multiple dimensions: electoral participation (voting), political activity (contacting officials, campaign involvement), civic service (volunteering, organizational membership), and social participation (community meetings, neighborhood involvement). Developed by scholars including Zukin, Keeter, and Dalton, it captures how citizens actualize their democratic role. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|