ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

单盲现场实验×单盲随机对照试验×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Mid-20th century (blinding conventions formalised 1940s–1960s)1948 (formalized); single-blind variant established in mid-20th century clinical trial methodology
提出者Established practice in experimental social science and clinical research; codified by Campbell & Stanley (1963) and Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Bradford Hill and colleagues (MRC streptomycin trial, 1948); blinding conventions codified in CONSORT guidelines
类型Controlled field experiment with partial blindingExperimental design — blinded randomized trial
开创性文献Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
别名single-masked field experiment, field experiment with single blinding, single-blind natural-setting trialsingle-masked RCT, single-blind RCT, single-blind trial, SB-RCT
相关65
摘要A single-blind field experiment combines real-world experimental conditions with partial blinding: either participants or outcome assessors — but not both — are kept unaware of treatment assignment. This design reduces demand characteristics or observer bias while preserving ecological validity, making it a practical middle ground when full double-blinding is logistically infeasible in naturalistic settings.A single-blind randomized controlled trial (SB-RCT) is a rigorous experimental design in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions while remaining unaware of which condition they have received. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts are not blinded. By masking participants, the design eliminates placebo and nocebo response biases on the participant side, while preserving investigator flexibility to administer and monitor the intervention.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Single-blind field experiment · Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare