ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

单盲对照组实验设计×随机对照试验 (RCT)×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineHypothesis test
起源年份Mid-20th century (blinding standards consolidated ~1950s–1970s)1948
提出者Classical experimental tradition; blinding formalized in 20th-century clinical trial methodologyJames Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948)
类型Controlled experimental designInterventional comparative study
开创性文献Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
别名single-masked controlled experiment, single-blind controlled trial, SB-CGD, single-blind parallel-group designRCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı
相关67
摘要A single-blind control group experimental design is a controlled experiment in which participants are kept unaware of whether they are receiving the active treatment or a control condition, while researchers and outcome assessors remain unmasked. The design uses a designated control group as the baseline for comparison, allowing causal inference about the treatment effect while limiting participant-driven response biases such as the placebo effect and demand characteristics.A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Single-blind control group experimental design · Randomized Controlled Trial. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare