ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

简单随机抽样×目的性抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Early 20th century; systematized by Cochran 1953/1977Formalized ~1980–1990
提出者William Gosset, Jerzy Neyman, and formalized by William CochranMichael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry
类型Probability sampling designNon-probability sampling strategy
开创性文献Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796
别名SRS, unrestricted random sampling, equal-probability sampling, EPSEMjudgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling
相关64
摘要Simple random sampling (SRS) is the foundational probability sampling method in which every unit in the population has an equal and independent chance of being selected. Because selection is governed purely by chance, SRS eliminates systematic bias, supports unbiased estimation of population parameters, and provides the statistical baseline against which all more complex probability designs are evaluated.Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Simple random sampling · Purposive sampling. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare