方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 简式效度检验× | 聚合效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|