方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 简式效度检验× | 验证性因子分析（CFA）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1969 |
| 提出者≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment technique | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 开创性文献≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|