方法对比

	简式量表内容效度	简版量表开发
领域	心理测量学	心理测量学
方法族	Latent structure	Latent structure
起源年份	1995–2000	1990s–2000s
提出者	Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)	Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002)
类型	Validity evaluation	Scale development methodology
开创性文献	Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111.	Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194.
别名	abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms	scale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodology
相关	6	5
摘要	Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.	Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality.