方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 简式量表内容效度× | 简版项目分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1995–2000 | 1990s–2000s |
| 提出者≠ | Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards) | Psychometric tradition; methodological articulation by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) |
| 类型≠ | Validity evaluation | Item selection and evaluation procedure |
| 开创性文献 | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms | abbreviated scale item analysis, short-scale item evaluation, item screening for short forms, SFIA |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover. | Short-form item analysis is the systematic psychometric evaluation and selection of items when constructing an abbreviated version of a longer measurement instrument. It applies classical and modern item-analysis criteria — item-total correlations, reliability estimates, and factor structure — to identify the smallest item subset that preserves the original scale's psychometric integrity. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|