ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

简式量表内容效度×简版项目分析×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1995–20001990s–2000s
提出者Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)Psychometric tradition; methodological articulation by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000)
类型Validity evaluationItem selection and evaluation procedure
开创性文献Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗
别名abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short formsabbreviated scale item analysis, short-scale item evaluation, item screening for short forms, SFIA
相关64
摘要Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.Short-form item analysis is the systematic psychometric evaluation and selection of items when constructing an abbreviated version of a longer measurement instrument. It applies classical and modern item-analysis criteria — item-total correlations, reliability estimates, and factor structure — to identify the smallest item subset that preserves the original scale's psychometric integrity.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Short form content validity · Short-form item analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare