ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

简版构念效度×简明信度分析×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1990s–2000s1990s–2000s
提出者Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteriaConventional practice; codified notably by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) and Stanton et al. (2002)
类型Validity assessment / scale shorteningScale development / psychometric evaluation
开创性文献Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗
别名abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validationabbreviated scale reliability, short-form validation, scale shortening, item reduction reliability
相关66
摘要Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement.Short-form reliability analysis evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale maintains acceptable internal consistency, validity, and structural integrity after items are removed. It is used in survey and assessment research to create briefer instruments that reduce respondent burden without sacrificing measurement quality.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Short form construct validity · Short-form reliability analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare