ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

简版构念效度×测量不变性检验×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1990s–2000s2000
提出者Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteriaVandenberg & Lance
类型Validity assessment / scale shorteningMulti-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure
开创性文献Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
别名abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validationFactorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği
相关63
摘要Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement.Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Short form construct validity · Measurement Invariance. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare