方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 简版构念效度× | 聚合效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteria | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment / scale shortening | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validation | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|