ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

移位-份额工具变量(Bartik工具变量)×回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20202008
提出者Bartik (1991); identification framework by Goldsmith-Pinkham, Sorkin & Swift (2020) and Borusyak, Hull & Jaravel (2022)Imbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
类型Instrumental-variable designQuasi-experimental causal design
开创性文献Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Sorkin, I. & Swift, H. (2020). Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How. American Economic Review, 110(8), 2586–2624. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
别名Bartik instrument, shift-share instrument, Shift-Share Araç Değişkeni (Bartik Instrument)RDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
相关55
摘要The shift-share instrumental variable, widely known as the Bartik instrument, is a causal-inference strategy that builds an instrument by interacting national or sector-level shocks (the shifts) with local composition weights (the shares). Its modern identification framework was set out by Goldsmith-Pinkham, Sorkin and Swift (2020) and Borusyak, Hull and Jaravel (2022).Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Shift-Share IV · Regression Discontinuity. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare