方法对比

	情感分析	文本分类	文本蕴涵
领域	文本挖掘	文本挖掘	文本挖掘
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	—	—	—
提出者	—	—	—
类型	NLP text-classification task	Supervised NLP classification task	NLP sentence-pair classification task
开创性文献	Pang, B. & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135.	Joachims, T. (1998). Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features. ECML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1398. Springer.	Dagan, I., Glickman, O. & Magnini, B. (2006). The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge.
别名	opinion mining, polarity detection, duygu analizi	text categorization, document classification, topic classification, metin sınıflandırma	natural language inference, NLI, recognising textual entailment, RTE
相关	3	4	4
摘要	Sentiment analysis, also called opinion mining, is a natural-language-processing task that detects the emotional tone of text — typically classifying it as positive, negative, or neutral. It turns unstructured opinion text into structured, quantifiable polarity signals using one of three families of approaches: sentiment lexicons, trained machine-learning classifiers, or pretrained transformer models.	Text classification, also called text categorization, is a supervised natural-language-processing task that automatically assigns documents to predefined categories. Building on the support-vector-machine approach to text categorization established by Joachims (1998) and consolidated in the text-mining literature by Aggarwal and Zhai (2012), it powers tasks such as spam detection and topic classification by learning from labelled examples.	Textual entailment, also known as natural language inference (NLI), is the natural-language-processing task of deciding whether one piece of text (the premise) entails a second piece of text (the hypothesis), contradicts it, or is neutral with respect to it. Formalised by the PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge (Dagan, Glickman & Magnini, 2006) and broadened by the MultiNLI corpus (Williams, Nangia & Bowman, 2018), it underpins question answering and fact-verification pipelines.