方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Quality Function Deployment (QFD) 中的敏感性分析× | 敏感性分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 实验设计 | 决策 |
| 方法族≠ | Process / pipeline | MCDM |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (integration period) | 2004 |
| 提出者≠ | Yoji Akao (QFD foundation); sensitivity extension attributed to multiple QFD researchers (1990s–2000s) | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. |
| 类型≠ | Integrated engineering design and decision analysis technique | Robustness wrapper — parameter / weight perturbation sensitivity indices |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., & Wang, D. (2006). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal of Production Research, 44(12), 2483–2504. link ↗ | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Wiley, Chichester DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | SA-QFD, QFD sensitivity analysis, robust QFD, House of Quality sensitivity analysis | — |
| 相关≠ | 2 | 0 |
| 摘要≠ | Sensitivity analysis integrated with Quality Function Deployment (QFD) tests how stable the prioritization of engineering characteristics remains when customer requirement weights or relationship matrix scores are varied. By systematically perturbing the inputs of the House of Quality, teams identify which design parameters are truly critical and which rankings would flip under different assumptions — turning QFD from a one-shot prioritization tool into a robust decision framework. | SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS (Sensitivity Analysis — Systematic assessment of output variation w.r.t. input perturbations) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. in 2004. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|