ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

对隐藏偏差的敏感性分析(Rosenbaum 界 / E 值)×局部平均处理效应(LATE / CACE)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20021994
提出者Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
类型Sensitivity analysis for causal inferenceInstrumental-variable causal estimand
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
别名Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivityLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
相关55
摘要Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding · Local Average Treatment Effect. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare